<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just add water</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/15/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/15</link>
	<description>Art + Life + Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/15/comment-page-1#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/?p=15#comment-49</guid>
		<description>An interesting thread about this technology is going on here: http://www.digitalmediatree.com/tommoody/comment/26367/  
Tom says: who needs more mass produced crap? Bill says: we need affordable housing, besides they might look great. Sally says: I want a replicator to make me dinner and I don&#039;t care if I&#039;m eating paste, so long as it looks and tastes like roast chicken.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting thread about this technology is going on here: <a href="http://www.digitalmediatree.com/tommoody/comment/26367/" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalmediatree.com/tommoody/comment/26367/</a><br />
Tom says: who needs more mass produced crap? Bill says: we need affordable housing, besides they might look great. Sally says: I want a replicator to make me dinner and I don&#8217;t care if I&#8217;m eating paste, so long as it looks and tastes like roast chicken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/15/comment-page-1#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/?p=15#comment-48</guid>
		<description>I still wouldn&#039;t mind a place in Montauk though.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still wouldn&#8217;t mind a place in Montauk though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mysteryjones</title>
		<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/15/comment-page-1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>mysteryjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/?p=15#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of another construction robot... this one&#039;s from Japan!
http://www.contractjournal.com/home/Default.asp?type=2&amp;liArticleID=22291&amp;liSectionID=11
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of another construction robot&#8230; this one&#8217;s from Japan!<br />
<a href="http://www.contractjournal.com/home/Default.asp?type=2&#038;liArticleID=22291&#038;liSectionID=11" rel="nofollow">http://www.contractjournal.com/home/Default.asp?type=2&#038;liArticleID=22291&#038;liSectionID=11</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MK</title>
		<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/15/comment-page-1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>MK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/?p=15#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Ya, the hand of the artist is bogus.  Whether you are getting a machine to do your work or other humans.  It&#039;s important to acknowledge your technicians or collaborators, be they human or otherwise.  Some people have this bizarre shame in giving credit where it&#039;s due.  But perhaps that&#039;s a whole other conversation about the particular aversion to admitting you didn&#039;t do it all yourself in certain kinds of media/robotic art.  

Painters seem to have been over this one for a while, building  whole fabulous careers on involving assistants - as Shawn mentions, our late Uncle Andy, also Mark Kostabi and his infamous army of painters at the Kostabi World studio. (pics of KW: http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/KW)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, the hand of the artist is bogus.  Whether you are getting a machine to do your work or other humans.  It&#8217;s important to acknowledge your technicians or collaborators, be they human or otherwise.  Some people have this bizarre shame in giving credit where it&#8217;s due.  But perhaps that&#8217;s a whole other conversation about the particular aversion to admitting you didn&#8217;t do it all yourself in certain kinds of media/robotic art.  </p>
<p>Painters seem to have been over this one for a while, building  whole fabulous careers on involving assistants &#8211; as Shawn mentions, our late Uncle Andy, also Mark Kostabi and his infamous army of painters at the Kostabi World studio. (pics of KW: <a href="http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/KW" rel="nofollow">http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/KW</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/15/comment-page-1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/?p=15#comment-45</guid>
		<description>The &quot;hand of the artist&quot; thing has *always* been a convenient lie. Did the old masters paint their own grass or skies? Not likely. Pretty much every form of art you can name has some machine helping you. Do you dig your own clay? Develop E6 at home? Mix your own pigments? Shear your own sheep?  No way, and so what?
What&#039;s actually cool about the concrete machine is that we are beginning to see the flexiblity that we now have in printing images being applied to solid objects. I used to make zines with a photocopier and razor blades. That was a ton of work- I used to impress people by having overlapping images in collages- I would print things on acetate and sandwich them to get the effect. Believe it or not, that blew people&#039;s minds back in 85...
Very, very soon, we&#039;ll look back the same way on how we used to cast things in moulds, or make them on lathes. We&#039;ll just print &quot;stuff&quot;. And we&#039;ll be as gods.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &quot;hand of the artist&quot; thing has *always* been a convenient lie. Did the old masters paint their own grass or skies? Not likely. Pretty much every form of art you can name has some machine helping you. Do you dig your own clay? Develop E6 at home? Mix your own pigments? Shear your own sheep?  No way, and so what?<br />
What&#8217;s actually cool about the concrete machine is that we are beginning to see the flexiblity that we now have in printing images being applied to solid objects. I used to make zines with a photocopier and razor blades. That was a ton of work- I used to impress people by having overlapping images in collages- I would print things on acetate and sandwich them to get the effect. Believe it or not, that blew people&#8217;s minds back in 85&#8230;<br />
Very, very soon, we&#8217;ll look back the same way on how we used to cast things in moulds, or make them on lathes. We&#8217;ll just print &quot;stuff&quot;. And we&#8217;ll be as gods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/15/comment-page-1#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/?p=15#comment-44</guid>
		<description>That Cloaca is sick. I think it&#039;s coming to Toronto, to the Power Plant? Or did it come and i missed it. There was a whole year where i didn&#039;t goto the power plant and missed things like Royal Art Lodge. So i dunno. I broke the spell with AA Bronson the other day, and while there i did look thru the Cloaca book.  This is not important though.

What about all the art star helpers? Like all of Warhol&#039;s assistant&#039;s in the Factory who&#039;d do a silkscreen then AW would sign it and deem it worth a lot of money? Though perhaps AW was talking about exactly that, the &quot;sacred hand&quot; and how easily it can be subverted in capitalist art circles. or something. Or maybe he just wanted a bigger place in Montauk.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Cloaca is sick. I think it&#8217;s coming to Toronto, to the Power Plant? Or did it come and i missed it. There was a whole year where i didn&#8217;t goto the power plant and missed things like Royal Art Lodge. So i dunno. I broke the spell with AA Bronson the other day, and while there i did look thru the Cloaca book.  This is not important though.</p>
<p>What about all the art star helpers? Like all of Warhol&#8217;s assistant&#8217;s in the Factory who&#8217;d do a silkscreen then AW would sign it and deem it worth a lot of money? Though perhaps AW was talking about exactly that, the &quot;sacred hand&quot; and how easily it can be subverted in capitalist art circles. or something. Or maybe he just wanted a bigger place in Montauk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chicken.</title>
		<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/15/comment-page-1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>chicken.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 23:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/?p=15#comment-50</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

