<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crumpled-up Paper Vs. the Idiolect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/100/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/100</link>
	<description>Art + Life + Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MK</title>
		<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/100/comment-page-1#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>MK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/?p=100#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Hey Maya,
Great point.  Idiosyncratic taxonomies are interesting in and of themselves, and are in a way a method for each of us to expose our own &quot;tagging idiolects&quot;. It&#039;s fascinating and fun, and much better than a drop down list.  
Bridging the gap is then the next step.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Maya,<br />
Great point.  Idiosyncratic taxonomies are interesting in and of themselves, and are in a way a method for each of us to expose our own &quot;tagging idiolects&quot;. It&#8217;s fascinating and fun, and much better than a drop down list.<br />
Bridging the gap is then the next step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtl3p</title>
		<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/100/comment-page-1#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>mtl3p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/?p=100#comment-240</guid>
		<description>good post
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maya</title>
		<link>http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/archives/100/comment-page-1#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>maya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.kasprzak.ca/blog/?p=100#comment-239</guid>
		<description>MK, you always help me make sense of somethign I&#039;m fretting about. 

Idiolects are sad when there&#039;s no framework to mediate between yours and mine. But they sure are a lifesaver when you&#039;re trying to sort information and make sense of the world. What a blessing that all those social bookmark and photo gadgets let me invent tags and cluster terms. Imagine we had to   categorise *our world* by recourse to drop down lists a la mid-90s yahoo directory? i feel like idiosyncratic taxonomies help maintain sanity.  But they are bound to isolate unless we persistently take care to adapt and bridge them in a way that generates folksonomies and hell ya, standards.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MK, you always help me make sense of somethign I&#8217;m fretting about. </p>
<p>Idiolects are sad when there&#8217;s no framework to mediate between yours and mine. But they sure are a lifesaver when you&#8217;re trying to sort information and make sense of the world. What a blessing that all those social bookmark and photo gadgets let me invent tags and cluster terms. Imagine we had to   categorise *our world* by recourse to drop down lists a la mid-90s yahoo directory? i feel like idiosyncratic taxonomies help maintain sanity.  But they are bound to isolate unless we persistently take care to adapt and bridge them in a way that generates folksonomies and hell ya, standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

